Monday, February 16, 2026

Gracie Abrams Slams ‘Demonic’ Removal of Pride Flag From Stonewall Under President Trump Directive

The Department of the Interior recently issued a guidance that has caused some stir in the public and media. This guidance calls for the removal of “non-agency” flags on federally owned monuments. While this may seem like a controversial decision, it is actually a positive step towards preserving the integrity and meaning of these important monuments.

Federally owned monuments are meant to represent the ideals and values of our nation, and are often deeply ingrained in our history and culture. They are a symbol of unity and pride for all Americans. It is therefore important that these monuments remain neutral and do not become a platform for personal or political statements.

The guidance issued by the Department of the Interior is in line with this purpose. It states that only flags of federal agencies or the flags of states and territories may be flown on federally owned monuments. This means that flags representing specific organizations, causes, or ideologies will no longer be allowed on these monuments.

Some may argue that this is an infringement on free speech and expression. However, it is important to understand that these monuments are not intended to be a forum for such expression. They are a tribute to our nation and its history, and should not be used for personal agendas.

Furthermore, the presence of non-agency flags on these monuments can be seen as a form of disrespect and even desecration. Not all Americans may share the same sentiments or beliefs as the organizations or causes represented by these flags. By allowing them to be flown on these monuments, it can be interpreted as the government endorsing or promoting these beliefs, which goes against the principle of separation of church and state.

Moreover, the presence of multiple flags on a monument can take away from its significance and meaning. It may create a sense of confusion and dilute the message that the monument is meant to convey. By limiting the flags to only those of federal agencies or states and territories, it ensures that the monument remains a symbol of unity and not division.

It is important to note that this guidance does not ban the display of any flag on privately owned property or on non-federal land. People are still free to fly whatever flag they choose in those areas. However, when it comes to federally owned monuments, it is the responsibility of the government to maintain their integrity and meaning.

Some may argue that this guidance erases the history and contributions of certain organizations or groups. However, this is not the case. These organizations and groups can still be recognized and honored through other means, such as educational programs or exhibits at museums. The removal of their flags from federally owned monuments does not erase their existence or impact.

In fact, by removing the distraction of non-agency flags, it allows for a renewed focus on the true purpose of these monuments. It allows for a deeper appreciation and understanding of our nation’s history and the sacrifices made by those who came before us.

In conclusion, the Department of the Interior’s guidance to remove non-agency flags from federally owned monuments is a positive step towards preserving the integrity and meaning of these important landmarks. It ensures that they remain a symbol of unity and pride for all Americans, regardless of personal beliefs or affiliations. Let us embrace this decision and continue to honor and respect these monuments for generations to come.

most popular