Thursday, March 19, 2026

Dozens of House Democrats push back on planned EPA research and development cuts

Dozens of House Democrats are standing up against proposed budget cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In a letter addressed to EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler, Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio) expressed concern over the planned elimination of up to 75 percent of employees within the agency’s Office of Research and Development (ORD).

The letter, signed by a group of House Democrats, highlighted the vital role that ORD plays in conducting scientific research and providing critical support to the EPA’s regulatory efforts. The proposed cuts would severely hinder the agency’s ability to protect public health and the environment.

Rep. Landsman emphasized the importance of the EPA’s research and development work, stating that it “provides the foundation for the agency’s regulatory decisions and ensures that these decisions are based on sound science.” He also stressed the need for continued investment in this area, stating that “cutting the ORD budget would be a major step backwards and would have serious consequences for the EPA’s ability to fulfill its mission.”

The letter also expressed concern over the potential impact on jobs, as the proposed cuts would result in the loss of hundreds of positions within the ORD. This would not only have a devastating effect on the affected employees and their families, but it would also have a ripple effect on the economy and local communities.

The House Democrats urged the EPA to reconsider these proposed cuts and instead prioritize the agency’s core mission of protecting human health and the environment. They also called for increased transparency and collaboration in the budget process, stating that “the American people deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent and how these decisions will impact their lives.”

The proposed cuts to the ORD are just one of many concerning budget proposals put forth by the current administration. The EPA’s overall budget has been consistently targeted for significant reductions, which would severely limit the agency’s ability to fulfill its critical role in safeguarding our environment.

The House Democrats’ letter is a strong show of support for the EPA and its important work. It sends a clear message that protecting the environment and public health should be a top priority for our government, and that cutting funding for vital programs like the ORD is simply unacceptable.

In addition to the letter, many House Democrats have also taken to social media to voice their opposition to the proposed cuts and to call for continued support for the EPA. They have highlighted the agency’s successes in protecting clean air and water, reducing harmful emissions, and holding polluters accountable.

The EPA plays a crucial role in safeguarding our environment and protecting the health and well-being of all Americans. It is imperative that we continue to support and invest in this vital agency, rather than making short-sighted budget cuts that would have far-reaching and damaging consequences.

As Rep. Landsman stated in the letter, “we must prioritize the health and safety of our communities and future generations over short-term budget savings.” The House Democrats’ pushback against the proposed cuts is a strong reminder that the American people expect and deserve a government that prioritizes the well-being of its citizens and the planet we call home.

In conclusion, the House Democrats’ letter to the EPA is a powerful statement of support for the agency and its important work. It serves as a reminder that we must continue to invest in the EPA and its vital programs, and that we must hold our government accountable for making decisions that prioritize the health and well-being of all Americans. Let us hope that this message is heard and that the proposed cuts to the ORD and the EPA’s budget are reconsidered.

most popular